Academic governance

Academic Board

The AAC Academic Board supports AAC’s academic governance, quality assurance perspective, and standards-based external review work.

The Board contributes to AAC’s academic perspective, quality culture, and institutional accountability. Accreditation and validation decisions are handled through the relevant AAC decision-making bodies.

Role and purpose

Supporting Academic Quality and External Review

The Academic Board supports AAC’s academic and quality assurance perspective. Its role is connected to institutional standards, academic expectations, external review quality, and the continuing development of AAC’s approach to accreditation and related quality assurance activities.

Academic Perspective

Supports academic and quality assurance perspective in AAC’s work.

Standards Orientation

Contributes to the development and interpretation of standards-based review expectations.

Quality Culture

Supports a quality culture focused on evidence, accountability, and institutional improvement.

Governance Support

Contributes to AAC’s broader governance environment and academic credibility.

Board members

Academic Board Members

The Academic Board brings together academic, professional, public-sector, and institutional experience relevant to external quality assurance and higher education development.

Steven Parscale, PhD
President

Steven Parscale, PhD

Chief Accreditation Officer, ACBSP

Dr. Aignald Panneflek
Vice President

Dr. Aignald Panneflek

Former Director Ministry of Education

Geneve Phillip-Durham
Academic Board Member

Geneve Phillip-Durham, BSc, MBA, Candidate PhD

Academic Dean

Nelson Genaro Navarro
Academic Board Member

Nelson Genaro Navarro LLM.

Former Minister of Justice

Lysandro Ignacio
Academic Board Member

Lysandro Ignacio

Entrepreneur

Governance connection

Academic Governance within AAC

Academic governance, decision-making, expert review, and procedural coordination have distinct and complementary roles within AAC.

Academic Board

Supports academic governance and quality assurance perspective.

Specialized Commissions

Consider formal review outcomes and decisions within their respective mandates.

Panels of Experts

Review evidence, engage with institutions or providers, and prepare findings.

Administration Office

Coordinates procedures, communication, records, and documentation.

The Academic Board contributes academic perspective; formal accreditation and validation decisions remain with the relevant AAC decision-making bodies.

Related pages

Explore AAC Governance

About AAC

Learn about AAC’s institutional profile, mission, quality assurance approach, and structure.

About AAC

Leadership and Governance

Explore AAC leadership, governance responsibilities, and specialized decision-making bodies.

View Leadership and Governance

Recognition and International Presence

Review AAC’s public recognition, memberships, partnerships, and international affiliations.

View Recognition

Contact AAC

Contact AAC for information about academic governance, accreditation, review procedures, or cooperation.

Contact AAC
Contact and next steps

Questions About AAC Academic Governance?

Institutions, partners, experts, and interested organizations are welcome to contact AAC for information about academic governance, accreditation, review procedures, or cooperation.